1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) shall pay to the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) KRW 232,00,000 as well as the full payment from October 14, 2016.

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

Based on the facts, the Plaintiff is a construction company that, from March 2015, performed the construction work, etc. (hereinafter “instant construction work”) to construct a main complex building with 15 stories above ground on a scale of 15 stories in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu (hereinafter “instant construction site”) from March 2015.

The purport of the argument is that the Defendant is the owner of the building in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu and the building on the ground (hereinafter “instant building”) located immediately adjacent to the construction site of the instant case. The Defendant is the owner of the instant building combining the instant land and buildings (hereinafter “instant real estate”).

On April 29, 2015, on which the Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded a sales contract for the instant real estate between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, the Plaintiff and the Defendant had purchased the instant real estate from the Defendant on April 29, 2015, in which the instant construction was underway, and KRW 58,000,000 on the date of the contract, and the down payment of KRW 232,00,000 was paid on the date of the contract, and the remainder of KRW 232,00,000 was paid on July 29, 2015 (hereinafter “instant sales contract”). The Plaintiff paid KRW 58,00,000 to the Defendant on the day of the contract.

The purport of subparagraph A, the entire pleadings, and the purport of subparagraph A. In the case of the instant real estate, the access roads to the instant real estate are connected to the access roads with a width of not more than 1.5m (hereinafter “the access roads of this case”). The Defendant allowed the owner of the Ulsan-gu D land adjacent to the instant land to use the water supply system free of charge, and the Defendant used part of the said land as the access roads of this case in return.

(hereinafter “The present state of the access road of this case”) (the evidence Nos. 4, 6-1, 3, 4, and 2-1 through 3 of the evidence No. 2-2, and the purport of the entire pleadings. The ground for recognition is as follows: (a) the fact that there is no dispute; (b) the evidence No. 1, 2, 4, 6-1, 6-1, 3, 4, and 2-1 through 3 of the evidence No. 2-1, 2, and 2-3, and the purport of the entire pleadings.