1. The Defendant’s KRW 82,462,00 for the Plaintiff and 6% per annum from December 19, 2018 to September 3, 2019.

1. On November 29, 2017, the Plaintiff and the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant”) concluded a lease agreement with the term of lease of five years from August 5, 2012 to August 5, 2017, setting the lease deposit of KRW 82,270,00 for five years from August 5, 2012 and the lease deposit of KRW 82,270 from August 5, 2017; thereafter, the deposit was increased three times until August 5, 2015, and the deposit was changed to “stock Company B” on November 29, 2017 without distinction before and after the change; hereinafter “Defendant”) concluded the lease agreement with the Defendant with the intention to cancel the lease agreement of KRW 90,236,670 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) or with the intention to cancel the lease agreement of KRW 31,200,000 among the Plaintiff and the Defendant, each of the instant parties to the lease agreement, including the Plaintiff’s deposit of KRW 31381.

According to the above facts, the instant lease contract was terminated and terminated.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay the above lease deposit amount of KRW 90,236,670 and damages for delay to the plaintiff, unless there are special circumstances.

2. Judgment on the defendant's assertion

A. According to the instant lease agreement, the Defendant’s determination on the claim on the deduction of the cost of restitution may either reinstate or pay the cost of restitution to the original state, such as the damage or damage to the apartment of this case, or the alteration of its original form, and may deduct the amount from the lease deposit if it is not restored to the original state. It is destroyed by the remote area and lighting equipment of the apartment of this case.