logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2013.04.25 2012노2545
농지법위반
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable in light of the following: (a) the Defendant embling the instant embling by confirming that there is no problem with the instant embling by the relevant Gun office through the construction business operator for the instant embling of the ground for appeal; (b) the Defendant restored the instant farmland to its original state; and (c) the Defendant was not guilty.

2. Even when considering the circumstances alleged by the Defendant in the judgment, the size of the diverted farmland and the level of the filled-up thereof are not small, and the Defendant appears to have claimed formal trial upon receiving a summary order of KRW 10 million as the instant case, and have restored the farmland to its original state. Considering the above circumstances, the lower court also reduced the fine of KRW 1 million by one million, and taking into account all the circumstances, including the character, conduct and environment of the Defendant, and the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records and arguments, it is difficult to deem that the sentence imposed by the lower court is unreasonable. Therefore, the Defendant’s above assertion is

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow