The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant did not interfere with and turn on the way of the victim and did not cause any injury to the victim.

2. Determination

A. The lower court determined that: (a) in light of the following facts: (i) the victim specifically stated the facts of damage in the first instance court; (ii) the police officer sent by the victim’s report to the victim’s photograph taken photographs of the victim’s parts, the victim’s statement is supported; and (iii) the victim was issued by the hospital a written opinion on the following day; and (iv) the victim’s parts and degree of the injury correspond to the victim’s statement, the lower court determined that the Defendant could recognize the fact that the victim inflicted an injury by smuggling the victim

B. Examining the above judgment of the court below in comparison with the records, the judgment of the court below is just and there is no error of law that affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding the facts as alleged by the defendant.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.