The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the lower court (eight months of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment is favorable to the Defendant’s confession of the instant crime, and there is no record of criminal punishment prior to the instant crime, and the Defendant’s health status is not good.

However, in this case, the fact that the defendant deceivings the victim four times in a year and six months, thereby deceiving the victim, and the quality of the crime is not good, that the amount acquired by the defendant is up to 5,3540,00 won, that the damage was not completely recovered, and that the defendant does not make all efforts to recover the damage.

In addition to the above circumstances, considering the scope of recommendations given by the Supreme Court on the sentencing guidelines for the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive and background leading to the instant crime, the means and consequence thereof, and all of the sentencing conditions indicated in the records and theories on changes in the sentencing guidelines, the punishment imposed by the court below cannot be deemed unfair.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.