Text
The Defendants are 5% per annum from June 28, 2019 to February 9, 2021 to each Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Defendant served as the vice head of the Defendant Company, and the Plaintiff joined the Defendant Company on October 1, 2018 and served as a member of the Defendant Company on October 1, 2019 and retired from the Defendant on October 2019.
B. On June 28, 2019, at around 22:15, the Defendant: (a) committed an indecent act by force on the part of the Plaintiff, etc. on several occasions, such as making physical contacts with the Plaintiff, who is a subordinate employee, while holding a meeting with the Dong debt belonging to the Defendant, including the Plaintiff, and making it fast to the Plaintiff, a subordinate employee; and (b) committed an indecent act on the part of the Defendant on the part of the Plaintiff; (c) according to such criminal facts, the Defendant was convicted of a fine of KRW 3,00,000 on January 21, 202 with the Sungnam branch of the Suwon District Court (No. 2019, No. 1011) and the judgment became final and conclusive.
[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap's entries or videos, and the purport of the whole pleadings, as a whole, of Gap's evidence
2. Determination
A. According to the above facts, it is recognized that the defendant committed an indecent act against the plaintiff, and the plaintiff suffered mental pain and shock due to such unlawful act.
I are clear in light of the empirical rule.
Therefore, the defendant is liable for tort, and the defendant company is liable for the tort committed by the defendant as the defendant's employer.
B. On this issue, the defendant company asserts that the defendant's forced indecent act was not an official ceremony, but a private-friendly group of friendship, and thus, it is not related to the execution of affairs.
However, the above evidence and evidence as well as evidence Nos. 1, 2, 6, and 9 as well as the following circumstances, which can be seen by adding the whole purport of the pleadings to the statements or videos of evidence Nos. 1, 2, 6, and 9, are prepared with the retirement of the employee of the defendant company, and the appearance of the outside person in the above ceremony was limited to 11 of the 23 employee of the defendant company, and the defendant's forced indecent act was committed during the above ceremony and was not large.