1. As to the Plaintiff A’s 156,485,590 won, Plaintiff C’s 4,000,000 won, and each of the above amounts, from July 1, 2013.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. D, upon entering into an automobile comprehensive insurance policy with the Defendant, set up and operated a creamet to Ekclass. On July 1, 2013, 08:58, in G Co., Ltd. located in Daejeon Seo-gu F on July 1, 2013, D, in order to carry out an electric cable support stand repair work installed at that place, H and I on the class connected to the said class, and H and I fell under approximately 7-8 meters, with the class while carrying the class, while carrying the class onto the said class.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

H around 09:26 on the same day, died during the instant accident to the hospital, and the Plaintiff A is his/her father, and C is his/her mother.

C. The Plaintiff A received the bereaved family’s benefits and funeral expenses from the Korea Workers’ Compensation and Welfare Service. The amount of lump-sum conversion of bereaved family’s benefits is KRW 142,350,000, funeral expenses is KRW 13,051,700.

D purchased the above cream in 2 years prior to the occurrence of the accident, and purchased the cream connected to the cream, and connected the creamet and the connecting pin to the above site on the day of the accident, and in the field, H and I confirmed the contents of the work on the day.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10 (including additional numbers), Eul evidence Nos. 1-3 and 6, fact inquiry results with respect to the Labor Welfare Corporation of this court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. According to the above facts, D is a driver of the cream, and D is an insurer, and D is a victim of the plaintiffs who are H and his/her family members under Article 3 of the Automobile Damage Security Act, as it is proved that the cream was well fixed in the operation of the cream and prevented accidents, and neglecting his/her duty of care to drive the cream although he/she had a duty of care to drive the cream, thereby falling together with the cream in the cream.