The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, as to the infringement of a special residence among the facts charged, the Defendant merely opened a victim’s house gate with his key, and did not intrude the victim’s house gate beyond the victim’s house gate as stated in this part of the facts charged, and did not recognize that the Defendant was in possession of excessive charges because he was aware of the fact that he was in possession of the excessive charge by admitting the transition by a mobile phone.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the Defendant did not attempt to force the victim’s collection of debt as stated in this part of the facts charged, and there was only a fact that the Defendant reported excessive progress away from the Defendant’s main money and collected play excessively while fighting the body with the victim, and there was no excessive fact of threatening the victim.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found all of the facts charged of this case guilty is erroneous.

The punishment sentenced by the court below (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

As to the assertion of misunderstanding the facts, the Defendant also asserted in the lower court, and the lower court rejected the Defendant’s assertion in accordance with the evidence in its holding, and convicted all of the charges of this case. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the lower court, namely, the victim reported TV, and the sound and lux distance outside of the police and the lower court’s court’s court’s “the sound and lux distance was out of the window.”

At a close range, the defendant himself was able to live in a bridge of the defendant, and the defendant was able to take the knife in the main machine.

The death shall be discarded.

Recognizing p.s.

D. The court below made a statement to the effect that D.I.D. again brought off the death of the family members of N.I.D., which is specific and consistent, and the victim was in the court of law.