1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of disposition;

A. The Plaintiff entered on May 13, 2014 and served in the 71st century from June 20, 2014.

On September 30, 2014, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “the right-hand side of the Cart Crat Disease” with respect to the check for the right-hand check at B Hospital’s Hospital on September 30, 2014, and received the “debrison compound method.”

B. On December 11, 2014, the Plaintiff was determined as unfit for active duty service on the grounds of the above right shoulder injury, etc., and was transferred to social work personnel on January 26, 2015.

C. On April 24, 2015, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the “the left-hand side of the field of the field of the bank’s check” with respect to the certificate of the left-hand check at the above hospital, and was under the knit’s colon. D.

On May 12, 2016, the Plaintiff discharged the Plaintiff from active service on the expiration of the service. On June 27, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of a person of distinguished service to the State with the Defendant’s “slele-guing shoulder, sle-sle-sleng, left-hand shoulder” as an application form.

On October 2016, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the fact that he was determined as a person eligible for the physical examination because he fell under the requirements for persons eligible for veteran's compensation, which recognized the “satise satise satum” on the left side.

E. On December 29, 2016, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of a decision on the person eligible for veteran’s compensation, following the physical examination of recognized wounds (as of November 25, 2016, the result below the grade criteria) and the resolution of the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement.

Therefore, although the Plaintiff filed an application for a reexamination, the Defendant rendered a decision on whether he/she constitutes a person eligible for veteran’s compensation (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that he/she fails to meet the criteria for disability rating prescribed in statutes again for the Plaintiff, following a resolution by the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap 1-6 (including virtual number), Eul 1-5, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion concerns the honorable treatment and support of persons, etc. of distinguished services to the State on the left-hand side (hereinafter “instant wounds”).