logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.06.25 2015나816
대여금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. According to the purport of Gap evidence No. 2 and all pleadings as to the cause of the claim, the plaintiff requested several times to repay the money that he/she lent to the defendant after November 201, 2013, and the defendant agreed to pay KRW 10,000 to the plaintiff on December 6, 2013, and KRW 5,000,000 to KRW 6,000,000 until January 6, 2014, and KRW 4,000,000 to KRW 5,000 to KRW 5,00,000 until March 3, 2014.

In light of the above facts of recognition, the Defendant appears to have promised to pay KRW 10,000,000 to the Plaintiff after borrowing money from the Plaintiff, and even if the Defendant did not borrow money, insofar as the Defendant promised to pay KRW 10,000,000 to the Plaintiff, the Defendant is liable to pay the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 10,000,000 and the amount for delay.

2. The defendant's argument regarding the defendant's assertion that since the defendant and the plaintiff shared a considerable portion of the expenses incurred during the period of living together with the defendant, the plaintiff cannot accept the plaintiff's claim. Thus, even according to the defendant's argument, the above money was used as the cost of living necessary for the defendant and the plaintiff's living together, and the defendant's argument is without merit, since it was not a money lent to

3. Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 10,000,000 won and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 20% per annum from November 3, 2014 to the date following the delivery date of the complaint of this case as requested by the plaintiff as the payment date of the above money after the payment date of the above money. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow