The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. The summary of the facts charged is the Defendant who is engaged in driving juk passenger vehicles.

On April 7, 2016, the Defendant was on the operation of the Jin Chang-gun D from a point of 600 meters away from the Jin Chang-gun of Gangwon-do to a vertical distance from the Jinung-gun of 600 meters.

At that time, the center line is installed with yellow solid lines, and the victim E (the 57 years of age, South) in the opposite lane is in the situation where the victim E(the 57 years of age, South) is being driven, the driver's duty of care to thoroughly operate the front city and prevent accidents by safely operating his/her lane.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to drive his vehicle while driving the vehicle on a full basis, and caused injury to the driver of the damaged vehicle E by shocking the front part of the damaged vehicle due to the negligence beyond the center line, such as a chest felling, which requires approximately eight weeks of medical treatment.

2. The E’s statement and statement in this court, the occurrence of a traffic accident, and the report of a traffic accident (on-site investigation) are made as evidence as shown in the facts charged in the instant case (the Defendant: (a) led to the confession from an investigative agency to the date of the first trial; (b) reversed the confession from the date of the second trial; (c) made a confession to promptly terminate the instant case on the grounds of an intention to have no yellow situation at the time of the accident and the victim taken relief measures; and (d) made a confession to the extent that the Defendant’s statement that the victim reversed the instant case to be clearly determined due to difference in opinions in the process of the agreement and securing field pictures, etc. after the accident, the Defendant’s statement that the front wheels on the left side of the Kanop vehicle stopped stopped more than half the central line; and (d) led to a collision between E in this court and E in which the vehicle was driven along the defense wall due to the direction of the passage of the Kanop vehicle.