logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원여주지원 2019.03.28 2018재가단1001
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The quasi-examination of this case shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of quasi-examination shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Quasi-Review Plaintiff).

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendants for ownership transfer registration under the Suwon District Court Branch 2017Kadan52066.

B. On May 21, 2018, the instant case was submitted for conciliation, and on the date of conciliation, each of the Plaintiff and the Defendants’ respective agents and the Defendants’ attendance at the meeting (hereinafter “instant conciliation”), and the conciliation protocol was prepared as follows (hereinafter “the protocol subject to quasi-examination”).

prescribed provisions

1. The Defendants are aware that the Plaintiff joined the NAAF as of December 24, 1969, and since 1970, the Plaintiff worked as a poractor with respect to the 2463m2 and H 4195m2 (hereinafter “the instant real estate”) in Gyeyang-gun G, Gyeonggi-do, and Yangyang-gun, Gyeonggi-do (hereinafter “the instant real estate”), and divided the rice field into three parts. The Defendants recognized that dry field was sealed.

2. The Defendants wanting to receive support from the Plaintiff for the treatment of a hospital for a balone’s disease and to transfer the instant real estate to the Plaintiff for compensation. Of the instant real estate, the Defendants registered the right to claim transfer of ownership based on the purchase and sale promise made on December 1, 1987 as of December 18, 1987, and recognized the Plaintiff’s commencement of possession with the intention to own the instant real estate from this point of view.

3. The Defendants recognize the completion of the statute of limitations for the acquisition by possession of the instant real estate from December 1, 1987 to December 1, 2007 by the Plaintiff.

4. The Defendants shall implement each procedure for the registration of ownership transfer on December 1, 2007 with respect to each share of 1/12 of the instant real estate to the Plaintiff on the ground of the completion of the acquisition by prescription.

5. However, the plaintiff shall pay a total of KRW 300,000,000 to the defendants who are the successors of the deceased J, each of whom is 60,000,000.

(6) The Defendants do not exercise any right to the instant real estate after this conciliation against the Plaintiff.

7. After the above conciliation.

arrow