logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.04.06 2017나2062762
반론보도
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The defendant is not the defendant.

Reasons

1. We examined the Plaintiff’s assertion in this court’s acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance. Besides, we cannot accept the Plaintiff’s assertion continued since the court of first instance for the same reason as the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, we accept the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The Plaintiff asserts to the effect that the Defendant, as a special broadcast of the Constitutional Amendment on July 17, 1992, reported to the Plaintiff that “I will have this history, which will be open to the public,” “I will report the Plaintiff’s death in the future,” thereby slandering or threatening the Plaintiff in bad faith and impairing the Plaintiff’s reputation.”

However, examining the transcript (B) of the broadcast in question submitted by the Defendant, the Plaintiff did not have any content of the report asserted by the Plaintiff, and even if there was a report asserted by the Plaintiff.

Even if it is difficult to see that the report was made by specifying the plaintiff, or that the report was an individual relationship with the plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

3. The judgment of the first instance court is justifiable, and thus, the Plaintiff’s appeal is not accepted.

arrow