Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who is engaged in one’s own business with the trade name “B”.
On February 22, 2017, at around 18:45, the Defendant met with the victim D(42) residing in the same loan that had been in dispute with the victim in front of the Seoul Western-gu, Seoul, the Defendant assaulted the victim, such as: (a) the victim said that “the victim is a person who knows or knows his face” while the victim said that “the victim is a person who knows or knows his face”; (b) the victim was off his mother used by the victim on the ground that the son is bad; and (c) when the son’s face part of the victim’s face is overfluened.
2. Determination is an offense falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the clearly expressed will of the injured party in accordance with paragraph 3 of the same Article.
In this regard, according to the written agreement bound in the trial records, the victim has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant on May 2, 2017, which was after the prosecution of this case.
Accordingly, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.