logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.07.10 2018가단62837
구상금 청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff is based on the Seoul Central District Court Decision 2008Gadan244098 Decided November 14, 2008.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the defendants as 197Gahap73983 in this court, and won judgment on July 8, 1998. The above judgment became final and conclusive on August 23, 1998. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the defendants as 2008Gahap24098 in this court for the extension of the extinctive prescription period of the claim established by the above judgment, and received a favorable judgment on November 14, 2008. The above judgment became final and conclusive on December 6, 2008. The fact that the plaintiff filed the lawsuit in this case for the extension of the extinctive prescription period of the claim established by the above judgment does not conflict between the parties, or is recognized by considering the whole purport of the pleadings as a whole in each of the statements in Gap 1 through 3 evidence.

Therefore, it is confirmed that the lawsuit of this case was filed for the interruption of extinctive prescription of the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants based on the above judgment.

The plaintiff's claim is justified and accepted.

2. Judgment by service (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act).

arrow