The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. Facts charged;

A. On June 8, 2012, around June 2012, the Defendant entered into a contract for construction works with the victim I (65 years) who operates the construction company H at the office of G Private Institutes of the school foundation in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul, stating that “The Defendant would pay the construction cost according to the nature and nature of the engineering works for medical facilities at the G Institute of the G Institute of the School Foundation in Gangnam-gu, Seoul.” On the one hand, the Defendant entered into a contract for construction works with the victim and the construction period from July 1, 2012 to December 20, 2012 with the cost of construction at the cost of construction at the cost of construction at the cost of construction at the KRW 3.7 billion.

However, the above construction site was subject to a construction permit around August 28, 2004, but it was an area where the Defendant could not carry out the construction project at the place where the order was issued by the Geumsan-gun on March 10, 2005, and the Defendant had already failed to pay approximately KRW 2.1 billion of the construction cost from around March 2002 to around March 2005. The Defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the construction cost properly even if he did not have any other property to the victim.

Although the Defendant had the victim perform construction works equivalent to KRW 19,7350,000 from July 2, 2012 to October 30, 2012, the Defendant did not pay construction expenses to the victim.

In addition, around August 15, 2012, the Defendant was performing the above work with the delegation of the Defendant at a place in Seoul Buddhist District.

On August 15, 2012, the Defendant was transferred to the national bank account in the name of G private teaching institute, the president of which was the Defendant, KRW 600,000,000,000,000 to August 18, 2012, from the victim who believed that he/she would have been able to receive the construction cost in connection with the said construction by making phone calls to the victim through K, and sending the cost to the national bank account in the name of G private teaching institute.

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, received the delivery of KRW 10 million, and acquired the pecuniary benefits of KRW 190,7350,000.

B. November 7, 2012