1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. Basic facts

A. C and D’s loan 1) C and D’ on October 11, 201, the Defendant’s “F” located in the first underground floor and the fifth floor above the ground owned by the Defendant, Daejeon-dong-gu, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, and the Defendant’s “F” (hereinafter “instant soup”).

(2) On October 201, 201, the amount of the construction work of this case was KRW 250,000,000, monthly rent of KRW 1,500,000, and KRW 1,500,000, and KRW 30,000,000, and KRW 250,000.

3) On November 2, 201, the Plaintiff leased KRW 25,00,000 as lease deposit money and KRW 22,00,000 as the monthly rent, out of the making soup of the instant case where C and D had been engaged in remodeling, the Plaintiff borrowed KRW 90,00,000 in total from the Plaintiff (hereinafter “the instant loan”). Accordingly, on November 4, 201, the Plaintiff and G limited liability company C and D borrowed KRW 20,00,000 (this rate of interest and delayed payment rate of KRW 20,00,00,000 as the annual repayment rate of KRW 20,00,00 as the annual repayment rate of KRW 20,00,00 as the annual repayment rate of KRW 10,00,00,00 as the annual repayment rate of KRW 301,010,000 as the notarial deed (No. 2014, Dec. 4, 2011).

B. J, I’s assumption of the obligation of the instant loan 1), C, and D were to borrow KRW 90,00,000 from the Plaintiff as above, and also to borrow KRW 130,00,000 from I. Since C, D, around November 24, 201, completed the instant remodeling project and started soup business, C, and D decided to transfer the said soup business to J, I, and D around January 30, 2012, and C, and C, and D was exempted from the obligation of loans to I in return.

J. I With respect to the total amount of 91,80,000,000 construction work costs due to the Ebergin system Co., Ltd., C and D, and the constructor K (L).