logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.04.28 2017고단1245
도로교통법위반(공동위험행위)
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months, by imprisonment for six months, and by a fine of 300,000 won, respectively;

2. Defendant B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The drivers of two or more motor vehicles, etc. involved in a joint crime by the Defendants shall not inflict any danger or injury on other persons or cause any danger or injury to traffic, while driving their motor vehicles in a front, rear, or right or right or right or right or right or right or right or right or right or right

Nevertheless, the Defendants, along with D (Transfer of Juvenile Protection Case on the same day), E (Transfer of Juvenile Protection Case on December 30, 2016), and F (Transfer of Juvenile Protection Case on December 30, 2016), from around 01:40 on September 20, 2016 to 04:10 on GCA 110 on the HCA 110 on the HD 110, and D 110 on the PCA 110 on the part of the Defendants, on the 3rd day before and after the front day of the station patrol 98, 10 on the front day of the station patrol 62-day, 200 on the front day of the station patrol 3rd day, 200 on the front day of the station patrol 1, 3rd day after the front day of the station patrol 3rd day, and 3rd day after the front day of the road patrol 1, 3rd day after the front day of the road patrol 62-day.

As a result, the Defendants jointly with D, E, and F, committed any act detrimental to others or resulting in any danger or injury to traffic.

2. The defendant B's violation of the Road Traffic Act (non-licenseed driving) that the defendant committed a violation of the Road Traffic Act (non-licenseed driving) at the end of the day specified in paragraph (1) through each place specified in paragraph (1) from the flusing on the flus road at or below the flusium at the end of Sinpo

From about 30 km up to the road, JCA 110 Obama had been driving without obtaining a motor device driver's license.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each protocol of suspect examination of the police against E or F (three times);

1. Each police statement made against K, L, or M;

1. On-site photographs; 1.

arrow