The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment is based on the following facts: (a) the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case; (b) the defendant committed the crimes of this case; and (c) the defendant agreed with the victim at the court below that the injured person does not want the punishment of the defendant; (d) the defendant did not want the juvenile protective disposition on several occasions due to theft and road traffic law violations (unlicensed driving); (c) the thief of this case committed the crime of this case in a very planned manner under the B’s conspiracy; (d) the thief of this case was committed in a very planned manner after the judgment of the court below was rendered; and (e) there was no circumstances or change of circumstances that may be newly considered in sentencing; and (e) other factors of sentencing as indicated in the records, such as the defendant’s age, sex, sex, environment, motive and background of the crime, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the above argument by the defendant is unreasonable because the sentence of the court below is too excessive

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.