1. The plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiffs operate the instant restaurant (hereinafter “instant restaurant”) with the trade name “D” on the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City C and the first floor.

B. On June 26, 2015, the Defendant found on June 26, 2015, that the Plaintiffs were in custody of ① 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 3, 14, 14, 1, 2, 2, 14, 27, 27, 27, 27, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 1,3, 1,000,000,000,000.

C. On June 29, 2015, the Defendant provided the Plaintiffs with an opportunity to present their opinions by July 14, 2015 when notifying the Plaintiffs of the prior disposition, but issued a disposition of business suspension 15 days (from August 10, 2015 to August 24, 2015) due to a violation of the business operator’s obligation on July 27, 2015 (storage food for cooking and selling after the expiration of the distribution period) (hereinafter “instant prior disposition”).

The plaintiffs filed an administrative appeal against the preceding disposition of this case, and the Incheon Metropolitan City Administrative Appeals Commission suspended the execution until the ruling was made, but on September 21, 2015, the plaintiffs dismissed their claims for administrative appeal.

E. On October 7, 2015, the Defendant rendered a disposition of business suspension 15 days (from October 22, 2015 to November 5, 2015) for the same reason as the foregoing prior disposition (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 3, Eul evidence 3 and 4, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiffs' assertion 1 that E, a real operator of the restaurant of this case, purchased fishing gear in personal cooking, and stored fishing gear in the restaurant cooling house of this case, but was kept for the purpose of using it for cooking food sold by the restaurant of this case.