1. The Defendant’s KRW 9,873,960 and KRW 9,863,010 among the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s KRW 5% per annum from January 12, 2017 to July 12, 2017.

1. On February 10, 2015, the Plaintiff purchased 2,457m2 (hereinafter “instant land”) from Dogdongdong-gun, Gyeongdong-gun (hereinafter “Eri”) and completed the registration of ownership transfer under the Daegu District Court No. 10469 on April 7, 2015, by purchasing 2,457m2 (hereinafter “instant land”).

The Defendant is the owner of F farm site adjacent to the instant land (hereinafter “instant adjacent land”). The Defendant had five livestock pens with a total floor area of 1,374.8 square meters (5 square meters, Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong 508.16 square meters, 220 square meters, Ga Dong Dong Dong Dong 65.52 square meters, and Madong Dong Dong Dong 16.2 square meters) (hereinafter “instant livestock shed”). However, the instant land was incorporated into the building site of the instant livestock shed, and among the instant livestock sheds, it was on the ground part (a) of the instant land connected each point of the attached Form 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1.

In addition, on the ground level of the part of the instant land, which connects each point of the 5, 6, 7, 8, and 5 of the same drawing indication, among the instant land, there was a fence installed by the Defendant (hereinafter “instant fence”) on the ground level, and among the instant land, there was a road (c) which connects each point of the 7, 8, 9, 10, and 7 of the attached drawing indication in sequence, the part of the instant land (hereinafter “instant road”).

After acquiring the ownership of the instant land, the Plaintiff filed an application for a building permit with the Daldong-gun Office to construct a new building on the instant land on December 2015. However, on December 18, 2015, the Gluri-gun Office requested the Plaintiff to supplement to the purport that the instant land exceeds 20%, which is the limit of the statutory building-to-land ratio in the natural green area, due to the existence of the instant cattle shed, to submit a plan for measures accordingly (such as removal of an existing building and alteration of the entries in the building ledger after securing additional site size). As the Plaintiff failed to supplement the plan, the Gluri-gun Office rejected the Plaintiff’s application for the building permit on December 29, 2015.

The plaintiff.