1. The Defendants: (a) each of the Plaintiffs A, KRW 6,770,749; (b) KRW 6,167,790; and (c) KRW 1,79,646, respectively, to Defendant C.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff A and B entered into a lease agreement with G on the leased deposit amounting to KRW 14 million and the lease period up to July 20, 2017 with respect to the leased house on the ground (the instant site and housing) in the name of the Plaintiff C in the name of the Plaintiff C, and resided with the Plaintiff C.

B. Defendant D completed the registration of ownership transfer on May 19, 2016 with respect to H site and ground buildings immediately adjacent to the above housing site.

C. I completed the registration of ownership transfer made on September 28, 2016 on the instant land and housing by marriage of Defendant D. D, on June 14, 2016.

Defendant E is the spouse of Defendant E, and the relative of Defendant D removed the housing on the above site and newly built the new housing.

마. 피고 E은 2016. 9. 9. 위 주택철거 및 신축공사를 시작하였으나 위 H 토지에 대한 터파기 공사시 토류판의 구조를 무시하고 강파이프를 박아놓고 널빤지를 대는 방식으로 공사를 진행하였다.

F. On September 20, 2016, severe ruptures occurred in the instant housing, and around 10:15 on the same day, other housing walls and the housing walls were collapsed together.

Does attached to a house wall, which were kept in custody of clothes, scrinks, and softs, beer, scams, scams, and scams were collapsed along with the wall, and the inside of the house was exposed to the outside.

[Identification Evidence] Evidence Nos. 1 through 11-9, Gap evidence No. 16, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. The above collapse accident is acknowledged to be the fact that the defendants caused the error of the construction of the base destruction by the defendants, and even the defendants recognized the liability to compensate the plaintiffs for the damages caused by the accident in this case, but they asserted only the scope thereof.

(b) Scope of compensation for damages 1) Positive damages (a loss, such as one clothes).