logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.03.22 2018고정133
도로교통법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act is a person engaging in driving a vehicle Bi30.

On December 23, 2016, the Defendant driven the said car without a driver's license on December 23, 2016 and continued to drive the said car in front of the D store located in C at the time of show.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle shall accurately operate the steering system, brakes, and other devices of the motor vehicle, shall not drive the motor vehicle at a speed or in such a manner as to inflict any danger and injury on others, depending on the traffic conditions of the road and the structure and performance of the motor vehicle, and has the duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by reporting the traffic situation well and safely.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and negligently proceeded on the part behind the Defendant’s driver’s seat on the front side of the Funching car owned by the victim E, which was parked in the front direction of the Defendant’s proceeding.

After all, the Defendant damaged the said Funstren car to the extent that the repair cost is equivalent to KRW 318,800 due to the above occupational negligence.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Non-licensed driving) Defendant 1 driven the said Frocketing car at a section of about 50 meters from the 50-meter radius to the roads front of the D shop located in Silung-dong, Silung-dong, Silung-si, without the driver’s license of the vehicle at the same time as the above paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. E statements;

1. Written estimate;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Previous convictions: A defendant's statement in court, inquiry about criminal history, copy of the written judgment 4960 High Court 2017 High Court (the defendant was unaware that his/her practice license has been invalidated);

However, the defendant left the place after the traffic accident of this case, the defendant continues to commit the crime without a license several times after the crime of this case, and the defendant has the validity of a practice license in the police.

arrow