A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. As a matter of the division of property, the Defendant: (a) discovered at the victim E’s house living in the third floor located in Pyeongtaek-si F on August 22, 2016, when he/she was dissatisfied with the friendly D and 41 years of age; (b) opened a visit to the victim’s house on the second floor; (c) laid down a stringer on the floor; (d) laid down the stringer on the floor; and (e) laid down the 2nd floor; and (e) laid down the string of the second floor; and (e) laid the stringer, such as flowers and cleaning machines out of the 2nd floor; and (e) laid down the 3rd floor of the 3rd floor, she laid down the stringor network, laid down the stringer, caused the stringer to break up the wall; and (e) laid out the stringer installed in the Republic of Korea.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victims' property.

2. On August 22, 2016, the Defendant: (a) 22:35 on August 22, 2016, at the house of the above victim E, she saw that the disturbance was 112 reported as the date of departure; (b) she received the face of the above police officer I from the police officer of the Pyeongtaek-gu Police Station G police box affiliated with the police officer of Pyeongtaek-gu Police Station that called out after receiving 112 reported as the date of departure (24 years old); and (c) her blue blue blue, taken the face of the above police officer I on several occasions; and (d) she spits down two times in the face of the left kne, and assaulted the above police officer H kin by drinking once.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases.

3. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Refusal of Drinking Measures) provides that the Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) of this Article, did so by drinking alcohol with a nearby drinking house after drinking the disturbance as above, and around 22:35, he driven and coming from the vehicle by driving J Ethical cargo at approximately 2 kilometers from the above drinking house to D’s house. The Defendant, upon receiving 112 report as stated in paragraph (2), was found to have driven while under the influence of alcohol due to reasonable grounds, such as drinking, smelling, drinking, saflying, and sacrineing the Defendant from K of the above police officer called for after receiving 112 report, and around 23:53 on the same day.