logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.05.17 2016누65550
부당해고구제재심판정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part arising from the supplementary participation.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court of first instance for the acceptance of the judgment is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of first instance except for addition, deletion, or replacement as follows. Thus, it shall be accepted by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

"No. 15" shall be added to "No. 15," in Part 7 of the judgment of the first instance.

On the 8th anniversary of the judgment of the first instance, the following parts shall be added.

Meanwhile, the intervenor recruited News World in the aforementioned publication of the recruitment of news articles in the field of the publication of the Korean news article. However, the above publication of the recruitment of English news "News Rewp" is the "News Rewp", and the above publication of the recruitment of news news "News Rewp" was the same as the above, and considering the contents of the curriculum after the recruitment of news and the Kamer test in the recruitment process, the intervenor did not necessarily have a contractual relationship with the plaintiff for the news publishing business, but it seems that he had an intention to have been in charge of the work of the Newers. However, since the contract entered into between the plaintiff and the intervenor was concluded with the plaintiff and the plaintiff, the intervenor did not have any strict evidence that the intervenor did not have any reason to recognize the plaintiff's work of News Rewp, and there was no reason to acknowledge that the intervenor did not have any reason to accept the plaintiff's work of News No. 9 of the judgment of the court of first instance.

arrow