logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원서부지원 2014.11.13 2014가단18029
채무부존재확인
Text

1. The plaintiff is based on each insurance contract mentioned in the attached Form with respect to the insurance accident caused by the defendant's diagnosis of brain termination.

Reasons

1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 3.

On January 5, 2009, the Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded a contract between the Plaintiff and the insured, and the insurance period from January 5, 2009 to January 5, 2070 (attached Form 1 insurance contract; hereinafter “instant Type 1 insurance contract”) under which the Defendant and the Defendant entered into an insurance without dividends (08); and between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff on February 26, 2009, again between the Plaintiff and the insured, the Defendant, and the insurance period from February 26, 2009 to February 26, 2030 (attached Form 2 insurance contract; hereinafter “instant Type 2 insurance contract”); and simultaneously with the instant Type 1 insurance contract, each of the instant insurance contracts (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”).

B. On February 1, 2001, the Defendant received surgery due to cerebral cerebralopia at the Gannam University Hospital on February 1, 2001, and received more than 30 radiation therapy from March 14, 201 to April 25, 2001.

After that, around March 2009, the defendant suffered from the cerebral mathy surgery and the mathy from the mathy, which occurred on April 24, 2009, and undergone a cerebral mathy removal surgery at the Seoul Samsung Hospital. On October 2010, the defendant received two mathal mathy surgery at the Gyeongbuk University Hospital.

However, as the defendant still continued to flow dust from the operation department, he/she received the cement removal operation at Samsung Seoul Hospital around May 201 and received the mathy radioactive ray operation at the same hospital on June 14, 201.

Even thereafter, the defendant was placed in the hospital emergency room or in the non-salymopic death treatment due to two copies, but all of the medical organization diagnosis managers are not the code c69-72 under the Korean Standard Disease Classification stipulated as cancer in each insurance contract of this case, but the code d32.0 (hereinafter referred to as the "coding number").

arrow