1. The judgment of the first instance court, including the plaintiff's claim extended at the trial room, shall be modified as follows:

Defendant.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this part of the basic facts is the same from the 16th to the 6 second half of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following parts, and therefore, this part of the basic facts is cited in accordance with the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

【 다시 쓰는 부분 】 ▣제1심 판결문 5쪽 13째 줄의 “별지3”을 “[별지5]”로 다시 쓴다.

▣제1심 판결문 5쪽 14째 줄의 “H”을 “J 및 H”이라고 다시 쓴다.

▣제1심 판결문 5쪽 아래에서 2째 줄의 “별지4”를 “[별지6]”으로 다시 쓴다.

▣제1심 판결문 6쪽 첫째 줄의 “갑 제1, 2, 10호증(가지번호 포함)의”를 “갑 제1, 2, 5, 10호증(가지번호 포함)의”로 다시 쓴다.

2. The Plaintiff, as the instant lawsuit, sought a corrective report against the Defendant’s legal newspaper company and Sauri-di, on the ground that the honor was damaged by each of the instant articles.

As to this, the above defendants asserted that since the plaintiff cannot be deemed to have a clear relationship with each of the articles of this case, since there is no legitimate interest in claiming a corrective report against the above defendants, this part of the claim is unlawful as there is no standing to sue.

However, in a lawsuit for performance, such as this case, a person who asserts his right to standing to sue, a person who is asserted as the person responsible for performance, has standing to sue, and whether the person actually has the right to demand performance can be determined within the scope of the lawsuit. Therefore, the aforementioned defense is without merit.

3. The parties' assertion

A. Plaintiff 1 C lost the case related to the instant case, and the Plaintiff led the appellate court to take charge of the instant case, leading the conclusion of the judgment of the first instance court related to the instant case, leading the judgment of the instant appellate court.

On the other hand, Defendant B's argument in the appellate case related to this case.