A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant caused property damage and interference with business: (a) around 21:20 on January 7, 2012, 2012, the Defendant was unable to avoid disturbance, such as: (b) on the ground that F was smoking in the “EM” column 3 of the Victim D’s “EM” operated by the Cheongju-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu; (c) the inside of the table, beer, beer, beer, and beer, etc., on the table by hand; (d) the microphones on the table are collected in the monitor; (e) the he was going through a hot wind; (e) walking the ice lease; and (e) cutting down the reflect cycle.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the main business of the victim, and damaged the victim's market price of 916,000 won, such as microphones, monitors, and reflects owned by the victim.

2. The Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective injury with a deadly weapon, etc.) committed three times the head of the victim with a ice lease, which is a dangerous object in which the victim F (57 years of age) continuously smokes tobacco at the time and place specified in paragraph (1).

As a result, the defendant carried dangerous things and inflicted bodily injury on the victim, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of causing damage to a deadly weapon, the point of causing damage to a deadly weapon, the choice of imprisonment), Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interfering with business, the choice of

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Da1548, Jan. 1, 201; Decision 201Da1116

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (the same as the reason for discretionary mitigation);