Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

Defendant

B. The summary of the judgment on Defendant B is not known to the public.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Justice] On June 25, 2010, Defendant A was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on September 18, 2010.

【Criminal Facts】

Defendant

B From May 7, 2007 to the same year

7. From May 7, 2007 to the same year, the person who was the representative director of E in the third floor of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D Building, and the defendant A was the representative director of E in the same year.

7. By the end of 24.2, the company was in charge of public relations, personnel, business, etc. as executive director, and is a student of the above B.

In fact, the F, which was practically leading the above company, was bound by the F, on April 9, 2007, to be in violation of the Act on the Regulation of Fraud and Unauthorized Receipt of Stocks, and the F, at that time, was bound by the said company to commit a violation of the Act on the Regulation of Fraud and Unauthorized Receipt of Stocks. Since the said company bears a debt equivalent to approximately KRW 800 million to the said invested investors without any particular revenue and was receiving money from a new investor and paid the agreed profit dividends to the existing investors,

Nevertheless, Defendant A, by taking advantage of his employees, had the intent to attract investors, receive money from investors, and with the employees of the company, such as direct or G, he/she may impose a larger amount of money listed after five months if he/she purchases the Y shares, which are promising venture businesses. Defendant A said, “The 15-20% of the investment profits per month and would repurchase the same price if the purchased shares are listed.” In such a case, Defendant A said, “The principal shall be recovered at five to six months only, and the profit shall be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to greater.”

On June 11, 2007, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, transferred KRW 100 million from the victim to the account in the name of E (State) as the price for shares 25,000 shares of the Dock on June 11, 2007, and acquired KRW 100 million in total by receiving KRW 25,000 from the account under the name of the Defendant as the price for shares 25,00 shares of the Dock on June 25, 200.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant ..