Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

No one shall engage in the business of converting into money or arranging exchange or re-purchase of tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game water.

Nevertheless, on September 12, 2015, the Defendant receives 120,000 won per day for money exchange business by receiving money exchange proceeds from a person who is not on his/her name. The Defendant conspired with the person who is not on his/her name with “as a result of a telephone call from customers who use the game room, by obtaining a right to subscribe to the event, and by receiving a right to subscribe to the event, to exchange KRW 9,000 per cash per one point of the right to subscribe.” From 21:00 to 19:15 on September 14, 2015, the Defendant used the game room nearby the Daegu Seo-gu, Daegu, Daegu, the Defendant carried out an intangible act of exchanging the game by deducting 10,000 won per one ticket, which is the result of converting it into 10,000 won per cash, from the right to subscribe.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of seized articles;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 44 (1) 2, Article 32 (1) 7, Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the selected Game Industry Promotion Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the head of an illegal game for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act promotes an excessive speculative spirit, impedes the awareness of sound labor, and thus is highly likely to be punished for the reason that it does not eradicate considerable harm to the society, and it is difficult to view that the Defendant is a genuine one in light of the attitude of

However, there is no record that the defendant is subject to criminal punishment for the same crime, and the equality of similar cases.