1. The Plaintiff:

A. As to Defendant B’s KRW 20,000,000 and as to this,

B. The above amount is jointly and severally with Defendant C.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence 1-1-2, Gap evidence 2-2, and Eul evidence 3 (the above document was made by the plaintiff's coercion, but no evidence exists to acknowledge it), as to the claim against the defendant Eul, the defendant Eul borrowed 20 million won per annum from the following day to the plaintiff's husband of the defendant Eul's 2-1,000 won for the purpose of establishing lease deposit as to the 102-dong 506, which the defendants will rent from the plaintiff, on October 4, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as "rent"), the defendant Eul's claim against the defendant Eul for the total amount of KRW 1,00 million from the next day to the 20-year interest rate of KRW 1,000,000 (hereinafter referred to as "rent 2,000,0000,0000,000 won for the repayment of the loan from the plaintiff 2-1, 2014.

2. Determination as to the claim against Defendant C

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the loan was jointly borrowed by Defendant B and Defendant C, but it is not sufficient to acknowledge the Plaintiff’s above assertion on the sole basis of the above evidence and the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 5-1 through 3, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Thus, the Plaintiff’s above assertion cannot be accepted.

On the other hand, however,