1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning for the court's explanation of this case is as follows in the basic facts of Paragraph 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance, and the statement of this case is accepted by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act on the ground that the witness witness's testimony of the court of first instance is added to "the ground for recognition" of Section 3 to 5 of the judgment of the court of first instance, and "the witness's testimony of the court of first instance is added to "the 6th, 10th, 10th, 6th, 6th, 7th, 7th, excluding adding

F. The registration of the establishment of a neighboring mortgage of the NEID Institute was cancelled on January 12, 2012, when the registration of the establishment of a neighboring mortgage was established prior to the registration of the establishment of the instant neighboring mortgage on the instant 1 and 2 real estate. The registration of the establishment of a neighboring mortgage was cancelled on the instant 2, 3, and 5 real estate on February 2, 2012 and cancelled on February 2, 2012 respectively. Meanwhile, on the other hand, on January 31, 2012, HH established the priority over the registration of the establishment of a neighboring mortgage on the instant 2, 2012, the amount equivalent to KRW 54,00,000 as the mortgagee, the Plaintiff, the debtor, the Defendant, the maximum debt amount of KRW 16,000 on April 17, 2012, and each of the instant 2, 300,000 No. 7,000,000 won was established.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.