(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2016.06.17 2016고단435

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2016.06.17 2016고단435

게임산업진흥에관한법률위반

Text

[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The name influence is the unemployment of the "I Gameland" located in the Northwest-gu H 102 (hereinafter referred to as the "I Gameland"). The name influence 2 (hereinafter referred to as the "J") takes charge of exchanging the game site in this case under his/her own name. The defendant A entered into a lease agreement with the head of the game site in this case under his/her own name, and if the game site is controlled, he/she takes charge of the overall management of the head of the game of this case, such as arranging books, customer reception, and the defendant C and the defendant D took charge of the general management of the head of the game of this case, such as the head of the game as an unemployed, and the defendant C and the defendant D, as their employees, took charge of the head of the game of this case.

No one shall distribute or use game products different from the contents of the rating, and shall exchange the tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of the game products.

1. Defendant A and the Defendants conspired with the “J” in collusion with Defendant A and B’s name and one-time wounded and one-time wounded, and the same year from July 14, 2015.

8. From the end of 21:40 on April 24, 200, the game of this case, unlike the contents of the rating for the game machine of “Addrid”, which is the game of the entire use, provided 40 game machine of “Nedrid”, which was modified to automatically proceed regardless of the game user’s ability to manipulate, such as where separate points are added to the original and added to the original score, and made customers play gambling and other speculative acts using the game of this case by making cash exchange after deducting 10% of the fee obtained by the said game.

2. Defendant C and D Defendants, as an employee, were able to take charge of the act of committing the same offense as described in paragraph 1 by “J” and “J” at the time, place, A, B, name-free boxes, and one person, respectively, at the time and place described in paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of the defendant A, C, and D

1. The defendant B's partial statement 1.

유사 판례

-대전지방법원 천안지원 2016.06.16 2015고단1607

-대전지방법원 천안지원 2016.02.05 2015고단2100

-대전지방법원 천안지원 2016.07.14 2016고단878

-청주지방법원 2017.05.11 2016고단2532

-대전지방법원 천안지원 2016.03.24 2015고단2013