The claim of the plaintiff (the appointed party) is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff (the appointed party).

1. According to the evidence and the purport of the oral argument as to Gap's evidence No. 2, the defendant's wife He had been convicted of 10 months of imprisonment with prison labor for breach of trust and fraud since he had operated a fraternity as a leader on July 8, 2019. The court was convicted of 22,460,000 won for the sperm A, for the victims, and 12,000 won for the Selection Party C, for the Selection Party D, 20,90,000 won for the Selection Party E, and 14,40,000 won for the Selection Party E, and 14,40,000 won for the Selection Party G, and 13,200,000 won for the Selection Party G, and 13,200,000 won for the first time for the first time for the first time for the first time for the first time for the first time for the second time for the second time for the second time for the second time for the second time for the second time for the second time for the second time for the first time for the second time for the first time.

2. The Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant promised to sell apartment units owned by the Defendant on July 11, 2018 to inflict an injury upon the Defendant, and that H agreed to inflict an injury upon the sperm. As such, the Defendant is obliged to pay each of the above damages, which has been decided in the compensation order, to the sperm pursuant to the above agreement.

3. The following circumstances, which can be recognized by the evidence evidence Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6, namely, ① the sperm gather in the apartment owned by the Defendant (hereinafter “the apartment of this case”) located in Chuncheon-si on July 11, 2018 as H’s first, and discussed about the compensation for damages; ② the Defendant stated the prior sperm requesting compensation for damages that “if the apartment of this case is sold, they would compensate for the purchase price.” ③ The Defendant demanded the Defendant to prepare a letter of the above contents to the Defendant several times. However, H demanded that “the Defendant withdraw the criminal complaint if it comes to a request for withdrawal, you will withdraw the complaint,” and the Defendant did not make a statement that “the Defendant would withdraw the payment of money,” and the Defendant did not actually sell the apartment of this case. ④ The instant apartment of this case did not actually sell the same.