1. A distribution schedule prepared on May 15, 2014 by the above court with respect to the auction case of real estate B located in Busan District Court Dong Branch.

1. Whether the key issue is whether the contract entered into with the wife C and his husband D is false

2. In light of the following facts and circumstances, C, etc., the owner of the instant apartment, concluded a false rental agreement with the Defendant, E, and F, the Defendant cannot be deemed a legitimate small-sum lessee.

On February 25, 2012, the Defendant prepared a lease contract with D and its husband of the apartment of this case [the lease deposit amounting to KRW 20 million with KRW 6 million with KRW 145,800,000 with KRW 14 million with respect to the apartment of this case (the lease contract amount was settled) with KRW 30,000 with respect to the above apartment without brokerage of a licensed real estate agent, but the mortgage was already established with the maximum amount of KRW 845,80,00 with respect to the above apartment of this case, and thereafter, the Defendant was registered for provisional seizure of real estate against the apartment of this case from May 20, 2013 to August 20, 2013 with KRW 30,000 with KRW 30,000 with KRW 30,000,000 with the Defendant’s occupation on August 29, 2013 and KRW 300,000 with the Defendant’s sale of the apartment of this case.

C. The Defendant explained that the Plaintiff was a director of the instant apartment as the instant apartment inasmuch as it was not economically able to respond to the lessor’s demand for deposit and monthly rent increase, while residing in the KRW 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won.