The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for six months) that the court below sentenced against the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. Although there are favorable circumstances such as the fact that the defendant's mistake is divided and reflected in the judgment, the blood alcohol concentration of the defendant at the time of each of the crimes of this case is significant, the defendant caused an accident due to each of the crimes of this case, the defendant was punished for the same crime of this case several times including two times of the suspended execution, and the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case without being aware of the fact that he was under the suspended execution of the same crime, and the court below has already selected imprisonment with prison labor and has already sentenced the lowest punishment within the applicable sentence through discretionary mitigation. The current Road Traffic Act provides that the prohibition clause of drinking driving under the Road Traffic Act shall be punished more strictly when the person who has violated the prohibition clause two times or more for the purpose of preventing driving under the influence of alcohol again, and driving under the influence of alcohol level of 0.1% or more, and the defendant's motive and circumstances leading to each of the crimes of this case, and there are no other grounds to recognize that the defendant's punishment is unfair after considering the circumstances of the crime of this case, and other circumstances.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.