logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2020.11.18 2020나875
등기명의인표시변경등기말소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: (a) the statement of evidence No. 19 and No. 20, which was submitted by the court of first instance, is not sufficient to reverse the facts or judgment admitted by the court of first instance; and (b) the statement of evidence No. 19 and No. 20, which was submitted by the court of first instance, in the last part of the reasons for the judgment No. 2, is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the following to the following.

"The content of the articles of association (No. 12) of a church attached to an application for the alteration registration of the indication of a registered titleholder on July 8, 2019 is identical to that of the articles of association (No. 15) before the amendment of the Plaintiff church. The above alteration registration of the indication is not the alteration of the name of a church but is merely the alteration registration of the name of a church, and the registration of alteration of indication was made within the scope that maintains the identity of

2. The decision of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

arrow