logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.10.05 2018고단2601
외국환거래법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Criminal facts

Any person shall report to the head of the competent customs office on the export and import of any means of payment exceeding ten thousand U.S. dollars.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, using around 18:10 on January 25, 2018, at around 10:10, was found to have attempted to remove 10,000,000 United Nations (US$ 219,79, US$ 235,317,60) without filing a report thereon with the head of the customs office, at the home deposited in the second head of the Kimpo International Airport in the Republic of Korea in Kim Jongpo, using 1065 of Asia or Aeronautical (OZ) from the territory of the Republic of Korea.

Accordingly, the defendant attempted to export the product without reporting the payment method exceeding US$10,000.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on foreign exchange;

1. Seizure records;

1. A seizure list;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning investigation and report on exchange rates;

1. Article 29 (2), Article 29 (1) 4, and Article 17 of the Foreign Exchange Transactions Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Articles 29 (1) 4 and 17 of the same Act concerning the selective penalty;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the amount of foreign currency, which was trying to take out with the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, is equivalent to the amount of the punishment of the provisional payment order, the punishment as ordered by the order shall be determined by taking into account the favorable circumstances such as the fact that the crime was committed in the attempted attempt, the fact that the defendant was committed against the defendant's mistake, the fact that the defendant was the first offender, and other favorable circumstances shown in the process of the record and trial of this case, such as the defendant's age

arrow