1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Basic Facts

The Defendant’s permission to divert farmland (1) is the Defendant’s permission to divert farmland for the purpose of creating a restaurant and a housing site (hereinafter “the first permission to divert farmland of this case”) with respect to the farmland of 101 square meters out of 152 square meters out of 2,162 square meters of 2,162 square meters of 2,162 square meters of 1,435 square meters of 1,435 square meters of 1,450 square meters of 1,459 square meters of 198, the Defendant is the Defendant’s permission to divert farmland of this case (hereinafter “the first permission to divert farmland of this case”).

2) The lot number is indicated only by the “H” in the case of Hadri in the case of Hadri (hereinafter referred to as “Hadri”)

(2) The Defendant: (a) divided the instant first permission on the diversion of farmland into the site of general housing and the creation of a restaurant site; and (b) filed an application for permission on the diversion of farmland by increasing the size of the restaurant site by 13 square meters; (c) accordingly, on November 25, 1998, the Defendant obtained a permission on the diversion of farmland for the purpose of creating a general housing site with respect to the instant first permission on the diversion of farmland for 101 square meters among 152 square meters in E, 2,162 square meters in 1,435 square meters in E, 152 square meters in E, 152 square meters in G, and 2,459 square meters in G, the permission on the diversion of farmland for the purpose of creating a general housing site; and (d) a permission on the diversion of farmland for 49 square meters in F. 30 November

3) The first permission to divert farmland of this case was granted the condition of permission that “I will divide the current state roads and road sites into roads so that they may be used for public use.” Accordingly, each of the above permission conditions for the first permission to divert farmland of this case was observed. Accordingly, the Defendant divided part of the land for which the permission to divert farmland of this case was granted on December 29, 1998 into one 125 square meters, JJ 148 square meters, and K 101 square meters, respectively, and changed the respective land categories into a road on January 19, 199. The Plaintiffs’ acquisition of ownership and permission for the diversion of farmland of this case 1) The Defendant changed the land classification into a road among the farmland subject to the first permission for the diversion of farmland of this case as above, and changed into a part of each of the above land of this case, which was divided into one 27 square meters, 27 square meters, 282 square meters, and 49 square meters, and part of the land of this case.