The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

The punishment of the court below (two years of suspended sentence for six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

The fact that the defendant has recognized his mistake, that the full amount of oil subsidies obtained by the defendant has been deposited, and that the defendant has no criminal record of the same kind is a favorable sentencing factor.

However, considering the number and amount of the Defendant’s defraudation, and the fact that the period of the crime is more than four years, etc., it is an unfavorable factor for sentencing, and other various sentencing materials, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment, it is not recognized that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable. Therefore, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.