Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Criminal facts

On November 8, 2015, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.098% during blood, 0.098%, was driving from around 80km to the road of 102.3km away from the Do in front of the mutual infinite-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Yan-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, to the Do in front of the finite-gun, Chungcheongnam-do to the Do in front of the commercial infinite-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, the Defendant driven CM5 personal taxi at about 80km away from the 102.3km direction of the finite-gun, Seoul, the Defendant proceeded from the finite-gun, the speed of about 90km each hour from the finite to the finite-do.

At the time, it was difficult to set off at night, and there was difficulty in getting off off, so the defendant engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the steering gear and operation of the steering gear by reducing speed and properly manipulating the steering direction and the steering gear by making it possible for the defendant engaged in driving the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was negligent in neglecting it while under the influence of alcohol as above, and was driven by the victim D's E driving of the victim D's vehicle in the direction of the course of the course of the course of the navigation at the same lane as the front part of the said cab, which was driven by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by negligence on the part of the Defendant, the victim, who was the passenger of the victimized vehicle, an injury, such as “influoral salt ties and tension,” which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, such as “influoral salt ties and tension.”

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendant’s partial statement (the Defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the blood alcohol concentration cannot be acknowledged because they had no record of strawling at the time of drinking measurement. However, the Defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the blood alcohol concentration cannot be acknowledged, but they correspond to the criminal facts of G public officials G who conducted a drinking measurement against the Defendant (in addition, G photographs the situation at the time of drinking measurement, and this shows this in this court, which was presented to the Defendant and his defense counsel, and the Defendant and his defense counsel confirmed the fact of st