Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months, and for a defendant B, for six months, respectively.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[Attachment] On October 2, 2014, Defendant A was sentenced to one year of suspended sentence of imprisonment for six months at the Changwon District Court for fraud, and the above judgment was finalized on October 11, 2014. Defendant B was sentenced to two years of suspended sentence of imprisonment for six months at the Incheon District Court’s Busan District Court’s Vice Branch on March 14, 2014, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on July 25, 2014.

[2016 Highest 2216: Defendant A] said, on June 1, 2013, the victim J at the victim J’s I office in the law firm I office in the Dong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City H building, Dong-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, that “I will give a contract for the civil works among them.”

However, the Defendant could not implement an industrial complex development project because the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to contract civil engineering works, as well as land purchase cost and construction cost.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, entered into a contract for civil works with the victim for the same day as the victim, and entered into the contract for civil works with the victim for the same day, and then 10 million won as the contract deposit for the same month.

3. 20 million won, and the same month.

4. A total of KRW 70 million was remitted to a new cooperation account (M) in the name of the accused and acquired by deceptioning KRW 100 million.

[2016 Highest 2324]

1. On April 3, 2012, the Defendants jointly committed the crimes of the Defendants, who were in the N10th floor of Changwon-si, Changwon-si, thereby working for one-time Q.

The same is also applicable to the case in the case of 2016 high-level 2389. The actual operation of the L development plan office referred to the victim P, “A L development project is being implemented in Scheon-si, K in Japan, and the right to operate the brin restaurant at the business site.”

However, the Defendants did not have the intent or ability to grant the right to operate the restaurant because the Defendants could not implement the industrial complex development project due to the lack of funds for the payment of statutory charges from the authorization and permission as well as land purchase cost and construction cost.

Nevertheless, the Defendants are above.