1. The Defendants jointly and severally against the Plaintiff A, KRW 234,391, KRW 621,461, KRW 878,886, and Plaintiff G.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiffs are old R Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “former R Co., Ltd.”)

(2) On July 29, 201, the Seoul Central District Court rendered an application for commencement of rehabilitation procedures as the Seoul Central District Court 201 Gohap105 and received a decision on commencement of rehabilitation procedures on August 10, 201, and received a decision on commencement of rehabilitation procedures on December 9, 201.

3) As above, the approved rehabilitation plan (hereinafter “instant rehabilitation plan”) is deemed to be the same.

Pursuant to the division, on December 19, 201, the bus sales business sector and the construction business sector were separated from each other from the company prior to the division. Accordingly, Defendant L Co., Ltd (hereinafter “L”) which is a bus selling company.

Defendant Q Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “ Q”) and the construction company

In addition, the surviving company, which is a surviving company, was established on December 20, 201, is a new company (hereinafter referred to as the “N”) with its trade name and, if so, a pre-division company with its name distinguished from N.

(4) On February 7, 2013, the N was regarded as a legal manager of N in accordance with Article 74(4) of the Debtor Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act.

B. 1) S Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “S”) (hereinafter “S”).

On October 20, 2009, this Court received a ruling of provisional seizure of claims from this Court on the amount equivalent to 1/2 of the plaintiffs' wage claims (excluding taxes and public charges) against the company prior to the division (hereinafter "provisional seizure of this case") (2009Kadan30264, hereinafter "the provisional seizure of this case").

(2) On October 21, 2009, the provisional attachment ruling of this case reached the company prior to the division. Meanwhile, the provisional attachment of this case was cancelled on November 30, 2010, and the notice of cancellation reached the company prior to the division on December 3, 2010. (2) The amount of the plaintiffs' wage claims which were provisionally seized prior to the cancellation of the provisional attachment of this case reaches the company prior to the provisional attachment of this case.