The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Of the facts charged in this case, the court below dismissed the charge of violation of the Labor Standards Act for each worker at the time of the crime table (1), 2, 4 through 8, 10 through 16, 18, 19, 21 through 24, 26 through 30, 33, 34, 36 through 38, 41 through 44, 48 through 52, 54 through 60, 62, 63, 66 through 72, 74, 76 through 81, 83 through 88, 90, 91, and 26 through 30, 34, 36 through 38, 41, 48 through 54, 62, 63, 66 through 72, 76 through 81, 83 through 88, 90, 91, and the remaining facts charged.

However, since only the guilty portion of the judgment of the court below is appealed, and the dismissal part of the public prosecution is not appealed by the prosecutor, the part of the judgment below's dismissal is separate and finalized, only the remaining portion of the conviction shall be subject

2. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) that the court below rendered on the defendant is too unreasonable as the sentence (2 million won penalty) imposed on the defendant is too unreasonable.

3. Taking into account the various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of the judgment in this case, the victim AB expressed his intention not to punish the defendant (the victim AI already expressed his intention not to punish the defendant in the original trial and was sentenced to dismissal of the public prosecution on that part) at the time of the trial, and even considering the circumstances in which the defendant asserts on the grounds of appeal, the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

4. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.