logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.11.10 2016가단24350
대여금
Text

1. The Plaintiff within the scope of the property inherited from the network D:

A. Defendant A is 18,241,737 won and 12,214.

Reasons

1. Review of the evidence Nos. 1-1, 2, 3, and 2-1 and 2-2 of the judgment as to the cause of the claim, the facts constituting the cause of the claim can be acknowledged in the attached Form No. 1-2.

Meanwhile, comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the argument in the statement No. 1, as a whole, D’s death on January 20, 2016 and inheritance of D’s property by the wife Defendant A, Defendant B, and C, and the Defendants’ inheritance of D’s property on September 2, 2016, the Seoul Family Court 2016-Ma3177, and the fact that the Defendants received an adjudication on acceptance of a report on qualified acceptance of a report on qualified acceptance.

According to the above facts, the defendants are obligated to perform their obligations to the plaintiff within the scope of their inherited property inherited from D (the defendant A is 3/7, the defendant B, and the defendant C are 2/7) and the plaintiff is obligated to perform their obligations to the plaintiff.

2. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants is justified, and each of them is accepted.

arrow