1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. There is no dispute between the parties that the Plaintiff had a loan claim, such as the description of the cause of the claim (the Defendant, on the ground of the above claim, refers to B) as to the net B.

2. According to the evidence evidence No. 1 of the judgment on the Defendant’s defense of extinctive prescription, it can be recognized that the period for repayment of the above loan credit was February 27, 2007. Since it is apparent in the record that the instant lawsuit was filed on September 23, 2014 after five years from the said period for payment, the said loan credit expired by prescription.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.