1. The Defendants jointly and severally committed against the Plaintiff A, KRW 20,122,191, and KRW 20,122,191, and KRW 20,122,191, and KRW 20,12, and KRW 191.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 3 (including virtual numbers) and arguments as to the cause of the claim, H, pro-Ma of the plaintiffs, on behalf of the plaintiffs, opened three bankbooks (Account Number: plaintiff I, Eul J, plaintiff CK, and deposit KRW 20,122,191, hereinafter "the deposit of this case") on behalf of the plaintiffs, and H died on September 23, 2003. The plaintiffs' denial L died on March 31, 2005. The above defendant, on June 19, 2007, voluntarily stated the plaintiffs' request for deposit money, and submitted it to the defendant 1 to the defendant 1 to the defendant 2, which was the employee of the defendant 1 to whom the defendant 2, who was the defendant 1 to whom the defendant 2, had become aware, at the time of death of the defendant 31 to whom the defendant 2, who was the employee of the defendant 1 to whom the defendant 2, was removed.

According to the above facts of recognition, Defendant D and Defendant E committed an illegal act by falsely preparing a false written request for deposit in order to withdraw the Plaintiffs’ deposits at will. Defendant F and G committed an illegal act; whether the written request for deposit was made by the deposit owner; and in particular, upon being delegated by the depositor, the applicant’s name and seal on the written request for deposit, they committed an illegal act by negligence even though they had a duty of care to verify whether the name and seal of the claimant are the same; Defendant CC had a duty to supervise Defendant E, F and G, an employee working on the business, so that they did not commit the above illegal act. Thus, the Defendants were jointly and severally liable to supervise the Plaintiff, even though they had a duty to supervise the Plaintiff E, F and G to prevent such illegal act.