beta
Text
The judgment below
Of them, the part against Defendant A shall be reversed.
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 15,000,000.
Defendant .
Reasons
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal by the Defendants is as follows: (a) the Defendants’ reasons for appeal are as follows: (b) the Defendants developed food waste treatment equipment difficult to the end of their life during several years; (c) but did not make a large profit due to business difficulties, and (d) promoted the type of business that requires the Defendant to be entitled to receive allowances by visiting the first purchaser of the products as a salesman; (d) the Defendants committed the instant crime; and (e) the amount the Defendants received as the basis for the purchase cost of the products was the same as the selling price of the market; and (e) each error is divided into the prices of the market customers; (e) the lower court’s sentence (as for the Defendant A, 6 months of suspended sentence, 2 years of imprisonment, 8 months of suspended sentence, 2 years of suspended sentence, 2 years of suspended sentence, 3 years of suspended sentence, 15,000 won of imprisonment against Defendant C and D, 15 years of suspended sentence, and 2 years of suspended sentence against Defendant F.
2. Determination
A. In full view of the following circumstances: (a) examining the sentencing of Defendant A; (b) together with the aforementioned circumstances asserted by the defense counsel; (c) the Defendant mainly did not focus on the degree of participation by containing the development portion; and (d) the Defendant did not have any criminal record other than the one time fine; and (e) other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing, such as the Defendant’s age and the environment, the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable.
B. In addition to the above circumstances asserted by the defense counsel for each sentencing against Defendant B, C, D, and F, the Defendants’ criminal period and the number of visitors, Defendant B, C, and D had the record of having been punished as a suspended execution and fine, and in full view of the various circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing, including Defendant B, C, and D’s age and environment, the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable.
3. According to the conclusion, Defendant B.