Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

Of the facts charged in this case, the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.

Punishment of the crime

No automobile which is not covered by mandatory insurance shall be operated on a road.

On December 25, 2012, at around 20:50, the Defendant operated a two-wheeled vehicle of 124cc, which was not covered by mandatory insurance, on the one-lane one-lane one way in front of the Korean Won-gun, Busan, the captain of the vessel, and at around 20:50, the Defendant operated a two-wheeled vehicle of 124cc, which was not covered by mandatory insurance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the notification of a person operating a unregistered earth and rocks;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, and parts concerning the rejection of prosecution as prescribed in Article 46 (2) 2 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act;

1. The Defendant is a person who has been engaged in driving of 124cc. occ. with no registered number plate.

Around 20:50 on December 25, 2012, the Defendant driven the upper part of the Obaba, and proceeded one way in front of the Hanbari-ri, Busan, the captain of the vessel, to the Library at the direction of the captain market.

Since there is frequent traffic of pedestrians, a person engaged in driving of a vehicle shall accurately operate the steering system, brakes, and other devices of the vehicle, and shall not operate the vehicle at such a speed or in such a manner as may cause any danger and injury to others, depending on the traffic conditions of the road and the structure and performance of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and found the victim C (n, 73 years old) who was crossing the frighton road by negligence, and caused the victim to go beyond the ground floor by putting the victim out of the frighton while driving the frighton road.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury, such as an injury to the upper body of the Bridges, which requires approximately 12 weeks of medical treatment, due to the above occupational negligence.

2. The facts charged in this part of the judgment are crimes falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the victim’s express intent under the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act