logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.09.22 2016가단18004
건물인도
Text

1. The Defendants deliver to the Plaintiff the buildings listed in the attached list.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Defendants.

3...

Reasons

The grounds for the claim against the defendant A shall be as specified in the attached Form for the indication of the claim.

The grounds for recognition: In full view of the overall purport of evidence Nos. 1 and 5 of the judgment as to the grounds for the claim against Defendant B and C, the Plaintiff is the owner of the apartment building listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant building”) and the facts that Defendant B and C currently reside in the instant building, barring any special circumstance, the Defendants are obligated to deliver the instant building to the Plaintiff, the owner of the instant building.

Defendant B and C’s assertion that Defendant B and C should reside until the expiration of the lease deposit under the lease agreement on the instant building. As such, there is no evidence to acknowledge that Defendant B and C concluded a lease agreement on the instant building with the Plaintiff on the ground that the said assertion was unable to comply with the Plaintiff’s request for delivery until the payment of the lease deposit. Thus, the above Defendants’ assertion is without merit without need to further examine.

Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is accepted for each reason.

arrow